Absolute

How many hours of absolute fasting will give accurate Fasting Blood Sugar reading?
Q. I am a prediabetic and I need to go to a clinic to check my fasting blood sugar. I am not sure whether 10 hours of absolute fasting (only water during this period) or 12 hours of absolute fasting will give an near accurate result. Experienced people please help.
Asked by CUTE GUY - Sun Nov 15 00:21:28 2009 - - 4 Answers - 1 Comments

A. A fasting blood test just means that you are not supposed to eat or drink eight to 12 hours before having blood taken. However, you can--and should--drink water. You should consult your doctor about whether your should avoid medications. The reason for fasting prior to a blood test is so that food and beverages do not influence your test ratings. Your doctor is trying to gauge specific information before any external substances create a false outcome. Tin
Answered by Tin S - Sun Nov 15 02:42:45 2009

I was wondering what would be the absolute best engine to put in a Toyota Celica?
Q. What is the absolute best engine to put into a 7th generation Toyota Celica? With unlimited funds, and the with out unlimited funds?
Asked by donkyranger - Wed Apr 4 08:46:21 2007 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments

A. with unlimited funds, why not just trade it in for a real car!
Answered by justcurious - Wed Apr 4 23:00:49 2007

Do religious people understand the difference between absolute truth and that which evidence supports?
Q. Someone was asking yesterday about accepting historical facts as truth when the evidence is not entirely accurate. It seemed to me that this person didn t understand that rational people don t perceive this type of information in terms of absolute truth or outright falsehood which is how religious people seem to perceive this information. Rational people look at information like currently accepted historical facts as just that, currently accepted facts; nothing more, nothing less. Rational people say, The evidence we have at present supports this understanding of historical events. We may discover evidence in the future that suggests something different, but for now, all the evidence we have supports this understanding. See, rational… [cont.]
Asked by Desiree - Wed Apr 8 20:04:53 2009 - - 19 Answers - 0 Comments

A. I have a "higher" IQ - I consider myself strong in my faith! If you wish to carry this debate, they are no absolute truths. There is always room for interpretation and correction. Religion is not about just a written word but about an inner search for meaning and peace. I happen to be Christian and within my "family" we have Dr's, RN's, PHD's and more. I don't think we have a "problem" with understanding intellectual pursuits. I think the pure intellectual has a problem with understanding faith! It takes a greater mind to acknowledge that which can not be tabulated or recreated.
Answered by JEANNIE - Wed Apr 8 20:23:20 2009